Category Archives: Screening

The Art of Interviewing – These Tools Can be Your Best Friends!

imageInterviewing can be tricky. You may spend a good amount of time with a candidate and still feel that you hardly know the person. The problem could be on the either side. Maybe you’re not asking the right questions to elicit good response from the candidate, or the candidate may not be good at articulation. Either ways, the issue is related to communication.

So, how do you break this communication barrier? Here are two tools that can prove handy:

1.      The “5-Why” Principle

2.      The “Tell me more” Probe

Conversation Tool #1:

The “5-Why” Principle was devised by Toyota and is used to find out the root cause of a problem. The idea is to ask “why” multiple times, such that the answer to the first “why” forms the basis for the next “why,” and repeating it till you get to the underlying cause of the problem. It is believed that one can achieve this in 5 iterations.

You can use this principle in your everyday interview conversations to understand your candidate better. For example, use it when you want to know:

  • Why the person is looking out for a new job
  • Why the person has applied specifically for your organization
  • Why the person feels she is a good candidate for the role being offered

Just pick up one question at a time and keep asking the why-based follow up questions till you have got the desired answer.

Conversation Tool #2:

The “Tell me more” probe is when you ask the candidates to provide more details about something. It can be about a project, topic, person, or situation. This tool can help you get more clarity on the candidate’s answers, understand his underlying thought process, and also verify his claims.

Here are some of the “tell me more” variations that you may use:

  • Tell me more about it.
  • What exactly do you mean by XYZ?
  • Can you give me an example?

Try using the above more often and you’ll see yourself mastering the art.

Would love to hear your thoughts. Please share your comments in section below.

About the Author: Vineet Arora is the Chief Executive of TalentNiti, a boutique talent search company catering to IT, Hi-Tech, and Consulting/Research sectors. He can be reached at



Leave a Comment

Filed under Interviewing, Screening

3 Techniques for Candidate Sourcing Using Boolean Search

aaIt’s a normal tendency for recruiters to use Keyword Search when using databases such as Naukri or Monster, or when scanning profiles through LinkedIn and other social recruiting platforms. Here you insert some commonly applicable keywords relevant to the JD and expect good results to pop up. However, in most scenarios, after a certain point, you start observing that you are getting the same set of results and feel saturated.

In contrast, there’s another technique, which is less commonly used but much more efficient, and that’s the Boolean Search. Here you use keywords along with the operators such as:

  • AND
  • OR
  • NOT or – (minus sign), depending on the database being searched
  • ” ” (double quotes)
  • ( ) (parentheses)

Using boolean search, you are much more in control of what you are searching for and therefore widen your scope of finding newer results every time. While we can discuss the advantages of such search at length in another post, let’s discuss how you can make the most of this search. Here are some smart tips:

#1 X-Ray Search: Use Google Search to X-Ray any site having public profiles. For example, a very basic X-Ray search to find profiles on LinkedIn, for say a social media manager in Gurgaon, may look like this: ("Social Media") (Gurgaon OR Delhi OR Noida) -inurl:jobs

What this does is – it looks for all the profiles on LinkedIn who have social media and either of Gurgaon, Delhi, or Noida mentioned on their profile page. The last part “-inurl:jobs” instructs Google to exclude all the results which are job postings, giving better filtered results.

Note that we have used all the boolean operators here except “AND”. This is because Google considers blank space as AND by default.

Various complex variations of the above seemingly simple search format are possible. Try Googling to learn more!

The best part of X-Ray on LinkedIn - you get more flexibility in the number of searches you can conduct than what you can through the LinkedIn’s inbuilt search box before you reach the commercial limit. Nice workaround, right? :)

#2 Spider Search: It’s a technique where you look for profiles which are similar to a specific candidate profile.

For example, while searching on LinkedIn, if you land up on a relevant profile, look at the sections “People Also Viewed” and “People Similar to” on the right. There are very good chances that these sections may give you some more relevant results. Continue the process i.e., going from one profile to another under these sections, till you start getting completely non relevant results.

Paid databases like provide a similar feature called “Similar Resumes” which is again very useful.

#3 Pin Code Search: Not very commonly used, but can turn out to be a great time saver in certain scenarios. Consider, for a certain position, you want to source candidates who are located within 5 kms or 10 kms of the company’s location, how will you do it?

While in Naukri / Monster you can do a city specific search, unfortunately there’s no option to filter by locations within a specific city. There’s a smart workaround though:

a) Identify the company location on the map

b) Mark all the areas that fall within the 5 km/ 10 km (whatever applicable) range

c) Put the names of all those areas ORed in the boolean search in the database

OR a much efficient and convenient approach would be to

c) Put all the PIN codes covering those areas in the boolean search

and Voila, you get the filtered profiles of candidates who have mentioned the specified PIN codes in their correspondence address.

I hope you’ll use the above techniques and benefit from them, and if you’re already using them, would love to hear your experiences. Feel free to add more techniques in the comments below!

About the Author: Vineet Arora is the Chief Executive of TalentNiti, a boutique talent search company catering to IT, Hi-Tech, and Consulting/Research sectors. He can be reached at

Leave a Comment

Filed under Hiring, Screening

Timeboxing for Recruiters

TimeboxingHiring involves several small activities ranging from sourcing, creating job posts, CV screening, replying to emails, telephonic screening, scheduling interviews, following up with the candidates, and so forth. As a recruiter, you’re always challenged to optimize your daily routine to maximize your output. So, how can you stay focused and improve productivity?

The answer lies in Timeboxing. It’s a technique wherein you divide your schedule into a number of small time periods (timeboxes), with each period having its own deliverable and deadline.

  1. So, begin your daily schedule by taking a stock of overall activities you need to take care of.
  2. Assign priorities to each task. For example, scheduling important interviews may take priority over fresh sourcing, or updating stakeholders about a cancelled interview may take priority over responding to routine emails.
  3. Timebox each task according to priority. Stay focused on doing that task alone during the planned timebox. Avoid the urge to respond to new emails that arrive in your inbox. :)

Typically, timeboxes of 30 – 60 minutes with break of 5 minutes after each timeboxshould be an efficient strategy for recruiters.

What techniques have worked for you? Please share in the comments below!

Posted by Vineet Arora, Co-founder, TalentNiti


Leave a Comment

Filed under Hiring, Screening

3 Key Hiring Principles for Startups


Hiring the first set of employees can be a daunting task for any startup. Having hired for various clients, many of them being startups, and also for our own organization, we believe the following can be easily considered as the key mantras for successful hiring:

  1. Hire Slow, Fire Fast

As a startup and especially if you’re investor-funded, you may be under extreme pressure to scale up quickly. “We need to quickly ramp up the team and launch the product at the earliest” – is a common conversation point in discussion rooms.

However, hiring too fast can actually prove to be counter-productive and you may run the risk of decreasing your “Talent Density” (a concept made popular by Netflix CEO Reed Hastings) i.e., the percentage of high performers in your organization. You should be very careful about the talent mix your organization should have. The right mix can help you roll out products timely, have more meaningful investor discussions, smoothen operations, and most importantly, shape the cultural DNA of the organization.

Having even one bad hire can put some serious brakes on your success journey. Rather than procrastinating in the attempt to make the relationship work or surrendering yourself to escalation of commitment, it’s better to immediately let go of the employee. For one person, you can’t risk affecting the morale of several other employees. Some people might get offended by the term “firing” but laying off doesn’t mean you have do it in an insensitive manner. You should always be compassionate during such layoffs and may also consider offering severance packages. 

  1. Hire the “Best Fit,” Not the “Best”

Hiring the best talent seems like a cure-all solution to many startups for their talent acquisition ailments. As a recruitment consultant, we often hear such statements from our clients:

  • “We want to hire from first rate Institutes only.”
  • “Let’s just poach people from Company X [market leader in the industry].”
  • “We are willing to pay handsome package to rockstar developers. We can even buy-out their notice period if that’s an issue.”

While strong credentials and impressive track record on the CV may seem like the most reasonable factors, they may not be sufficient to predict the future performance of the candidate. For example, the person might have performed well in a team earlier but may not be able to take full ownership of a work stream independently. Or, the person might have successfully led a large team of programmers in the previous organization but may not feel comfortable doing the heavy lifting required to get things done in a smaller setup.

So what you actually need to look for is someone who can be “good fit” for your organization – both technically and culturally.

  1. Hire Objectively, Not Based On Gut

Hiring managers would agree that hiring decisions are often taken within the first few minutes of the conversation with the candidate. You get a feeling whether you’re going to hire the person or not. Sometimes, it all boils down to the “likeability” of the candidate. However, such decisions based primarily on a gut instinct may go wrong. Have you ever been in a situation when you almost believed that the candidate would turn around the fortunes of your company, only to find later that the person couldn’t perform even the basic tasks?

To avoid such surprises and minimize error, start including more objectivity in your hiring process. Look for the actual skills and behaviour of the potential hires by creating coding challenges, conducting technical and behavioural assessments, performing psychometric analysis, and including role plays.

What best practices do you follow while hiring for your organization? Would love to hear your thoughts!

Posted by Vineet Arora, Co-founder, TalentNiti

Image courtesy: Mashable

Leave a Comment

Filed under Hiring, Interviewing, Screening, Startups

Hire for ATTITUDE, Not Just Knowledge and Skills

AttitudeHave you found yourself in a position when you hired someone who was extremely impressive during the interview but didn’t perform well after joining the organization? Ever wondered what went wrong?

Well, you hired the wrong person, and it’s the hiring process that needs to be blamed. You probably focused on the candidate’s knowledge and skills, but missed one key component – ATTITUDE.

A “successful” hire is the one who possesses all the three: Attitude (A), Skills (S), and Knowledge (K), or simply put “ASK.”

  1. Knowledge – It is the understanding of the domain related to the job. If you are hiring someone to work in the Telecom industry, you would want the person to have at least some basic knowledge of that domain.
  2. Skills – These reflect the ability of the person to perform tasks associated with the job. If the job requires the person to manage projects, you need to evaluate for project management skills. If it’s a customer-facing role, communication and negotiation skills become most important, and so on.
  3. Attitude – It is shaped by the intrinsic beliefs of the person. It defines the person’s behavior i.e., how well the person will use his knowledge and skills to perform the job. It influences how well the person will adapt to the new work environment, respond to and internalize new teachings, deal with failure, work with colleagues, and so forth.

While it’s easy to coach the person to acquire new knowledge and skills, it’s hard to influence and shape his attitude.

Therefore, it becomes even more prudent to assess for attitude. So, how do you really find out if the candidate has the right attitude for the job? Here’s a two-step process that you may find useful:

Step 1: Identify key job-related attitudinal behaviors – First, define what are the key behaviors required for succeeding in the job. For example, if you are hiring for a high-stress customer-servicing role, your ideal hire would be someone who is patient and has a calm and composed temperament. If you are hiring for a teaching profile, the best fit would be someone who is caring, has empathy, and encourages creativity.

Step 2: Ask targeted questions to test for those specific behaviors – Once you know the desired behaviors, you should focus on behavioral questions to identify suitable candidates. Ask them how they reacted to/dealt with a similar situation in the past.

Here are some sample questions:

  • Tell me about a situation when you had to deal with a difficult customer and how you handled it. [Temperament]
  • How do you make out what your team members are feeling? [Empathy]
  • What did you do when you received negative feedback from your manager? [Resilience]
  • Have you had an experience of working in a team that didn’t get along well? What did you do?  [Team playing]
  • Describe a situation when you were able to save yourself time or money? [Resourcefulness]

So, what are your thoughts on the ASK principle. What techniques do you use to assess candidates’ ASK? Let us know in the comments below.

Posted By Mallika Arora, Co-founder, TalentNiti


1 Comment

Filed under Hiring, Interviewing, Screening, Skills